In an era where environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting is no longer a corporate buzzword but a regulatory necessity, it's surprising that 47% of companies still rely on spreadsheets to support their sustainability processes. As the European Union's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) tightens the screws on sustainability reporting, the manual, spreadsheet-driven approach increasingly reveals its significant drawbacks.
47% of companies fall short by relying on spreadsheets to guide their sustainability reporting
The Impaakt Team
8 min Read Time | September 24th 2024
The Efficiency Trap: Why Spreadsheets Fall Short
One of the most glaring issues with using spreadsheets for sustainability is the inefficiency inherent in decentralized data collection. When sustainability data is collected across multiple departments and locations, the lack of a centralized system means that information often has to be manually aggregated. This not only takes time but also introduces the risk of discrepancies and errors that can complicate the process further down the line.
Moreover, engaging stakeholders through traditional methods such as surveys and workshops is a resource-intensive task. When managed via spreadsheets, the coordination becomes even more cumbersome, requiring numerous manual updates and constant attention to detail. The result is a time-consuming process that can drain resources and slow the company’s ability to act on its sustainability goals.
Auditing and reporting add another layer of complexity. Each year, companies are often forced to start from scratch, rebuilding the previous year's work due to the lack of a robust, continuous system. This reset is not only inefficient but also increases the likelihood of inconsistencies and errors, which can be costly in both time and reputation.
Quality Risks: The Downside of Manual Processes
Quality control is another major concern when relying on spreadsheets. With multiple users handling data, the risk of human error escalates. Inaccurate data entry, formula mistakes, or misinterpreting results can all lead to flawed reporting. Given the increasing scrutiny from regulators and stakeholders, these errors can have significant repercussions.
The rapid pace of regulatory changes, especially under CSRD, exacerbates these issues. Companies are often left scrambling to update their spreadsheets and files, leading to delays, gaps, and inconsistencies in their reporting. As sustainability reporting evolves, the lack of a flexible, adaptive system like specialized software can leave companies vulnerable to non-compliance.
Another critical issue is data history. Maintaining a consistent and accessible data history is a challenge when using spreadsheets. Files can easily be lost, overwritten, or corrupted, making it difficult to ensure continuity and reliability in reporting year after year. This lack of historical data can also hinder a company’s ability to track its sustainability progress over time.
Integration Challenges: The Need for a Unified Approach
Integration is key to effective sustainability management, yet it’s another area where spreadsheets often fall short. Sharing data with stakeholders, auditors, and regulators is a cumbersome process when using standalone spreadsheets. Without integrated tools, companies struggle to provide timely, accurate, and comprehensive data to those who need it.
Access to sector-specific data is another challenge. Sustainability reporting often requires benchmarking against industry standards or incorporating sector-specific metrics. However, this information is often fragmented and difficult to consolidate using traditional data management processes, leading to incomplete or inaccurate reporting.
The lack of integration also means that companies miss out on opportunities to streamline their sustainability processes. Integrated software solutions can automate data collection, ensure accuracy through real-time updates, and facilitate seamless communication with all stakeholders. Without these tools, companies are left with an inefficient, error-prone system that hinders their sustainability efforts.
It's Time to Rethink Sustainability Management
As CSRD brings sustainability reporting to the forefront of corporate governance, the limitations of using spreadsheets become increasingly apparent. The inefficiencies, quality risks, and integration challenges posed by this manual approach make it clear that companies must think how they manage their sustainability processes.
Investing in specialized sustainability management software can provide a centralized, integrated platform that enhances efficiency, ensures data quality, and simplifies reporting. By moving away from traditional methods and embracing technology, companies can not only meet regulatory requirements but also drive their sustainability agenda forward with confidence.
The future of sustainability reporting is digital, and companies that fail to adapt may find themselves left behind.
Spread the word about Impaakt
May 23
12 Min read
There’s no sustainability without stakeholders
Stakeholder engagement in the double materiality assessment for the CSRD
Jan 23
10 Min read
Directionally Right or Precisely Wrong?
Explore the sustainability data landscape, and the choice between prioritizing directional accuracy, recognizing unquantifiable impacts, or pursuing precision at the risk of oversight.
Let’s take action together
With the right investment companies having a positive impact on the planet are able to flourish. Our community forms part of that mission by measuring their impact.
